ABSTRACT
What is this summary about? This is a summary of an article about part of a clinical study for the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine, also called the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The article was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in May 2021. This summary describes how the vaccine worked in participants 12- to 15-years old. The part of the study described in the article is ongoing and expected to finish March 2023. This means that the final results may be different from the results included in this summary. What happened in this study? The part of the study described in this summary included participants 12- to 15-years old who had no serious health issues. The BNT162b2 vaccine had already been studied in participants 16 years of age or older. In this part of the study, the researchers wanted to find out: * How effective and safe the vaccine was in participants 12- to 15-years old. * What the immune response to the vaccine and the vaccine safety were like in 12- to 15-year-olds compared with 16- to 25-year-olds. * How well the vaccine prevented SARS-CoV-2 infections in participants who received the vaccine compared to those who did not. This is also called efficacy of the BNT162b2 vaccine Half of the participants in this study received 2 injections of the BNT162b2 vaccine and half received 2 injections of a placebo in a muscle of the upper arm. The placebo looked like the BNT162b2 vaccine but did not have any active vaccine in it. What were the results? * BNT162b2 had a favorable safety profile. The most common reactions were pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. None of the participants had serious reactions to the vaccine. * The 12- to 15-year-old participants' immune system responses to the BNT162b2 vaccine were as good as or stronger than the 16- to 25-year-old participants' immune responses. * The participants who received the BNT162b2 vaccine were less likely to get COVID-19 compared with the participants who got the placebo.Copyright © 2023 The Authors.
ABSTRACT
What is this summary about?This is a summary of an article about part of a clinical study for the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine, also called the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The article was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in September 2021. The part of the study described in the article began in July 2020 and is ongoing. This means that the final results may be different from the results included in this summary.What happened in this study?The participants in this study received 2 injections of either the BNT162b2 vaccine or a placebo, 21 days apart. The placebo looked like the BNT162b2 vaccine but had no active vaccine in it. None of the trial participants or study teams knew who received vaccine or placebo.What were the results?Most of the reactions to the injections were mild or moderate and lasted for a short period of time. The most common reactions were pain at the injection site, extreme tiredness (fatigue), and headache. These reactions usually happened in the first 7 days after receiving a vaccine dose. A small number of participants had severe reactions to the vaccine.Compared to participants who received the placebo, participants who received the BNT162b2 vaccine were much less likely to become ill if they were infected with the virus that causes COVID-19. The vaccine also had very good efficacy at preventing severe COVID-19.Participants in South Africa who received the BNT162b2 vaccine were less likely to become ill after infection with the beta variant of the virus compared to participants who received the placebo. The beta variant was very common in South Africa when the study was taking place.
ABSTRACT
Background. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important cause of disease in older adults and is associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially in those with high-risk conditions. Illness can vary from mild upper respiratory tract symptoms to more severe lower respiratory tract disease. After over 50 years of research, there is now hope for an RSV vaccine for any population, including older adults. An investigational bivalent RSV A and B, stabilized RSV prefusion F subunit vaccine (RSVpreF) was assessed successfully in a pivotal phase 3 efficacy study in older adults. (NCT05035212). Methods. The primary efficacy objective of this Phase 3, global, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the prevention of RSV associated lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI-RSV) in up to 40,000 adults >=60 years of age during the first winter season (September 2021-June 2022). Two primary endpoints were tested sequentially - LRTI-RSV with >=2 and >=3 symptoms. A pre-planned efficacy interim analysis (IA) was to be conducted by an external Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) upon accrual of at least 29 cases of LRTI-RSV with >=2 symptoms. With efficacy demonstrated for cases with >=2 symptoms and sufficient cases with >= 3 symptoms accrued, an efficacy analysis of cases with >= 3 symptoms was to be conducted. The ongoing study is collecting additional safety and descriptive efficacy data. Results. At the time of the IA, approximately 34,000 participants received either RSVpreF 120 mug (60 mug each of RSVpreF from RSV A and RSV B) or placebo (1:1 randomization). Forty-four LRTI-RSV cases with >=2 symptoms were accrued with 11 cases in the RSVpreF group and 33 cases in the placebo group corresponding to a VE of 66.7% (96.66% CI: 28.8%, 85.8%). Sixteen LRTI-RSV cases with >=3 symptoms were accrued with 2 cases in the RSVpreF group and 14 cases in the placebo group corresponding to a VE of 85.7% (96.66% CI: 32.0%, 98.7%). The investigational vaccine was well-tolerated with no safety concerns. Conclusion. Despite unpredictable RSV activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the primary objective of the study was met demonstrating that RSVpreF had a favorable safety profile and was highly efficacious in preventing LRTI-RSV with >=2 symptoms and >=3 symptoms in older adults 60 years and older.